The Parkside kit seems to represent Hudson's standard 27 cubic foot 'Rugga' skip (a design introduced in the mid 1930s) judging by the body shape, the larger 36 and 54 cu.ft. skips had more angular bodies. However, most of the 27cu.ft. Rugga skips that I've seen have frames that differ slightly from the Parkside kit, mainly in respect to the crossbrace, so when I built a couple more I made a few modifications.
The kits came with 5.1mm dia. disc wheels, I wanted 4 hole disc wheels so the first job was to set the Unimat up as a drill press and using my dividing head I drilled 4 equally spaced .6mm holes in each wheel;
On the wagon below I've cut away the central cross brace leaving only the longitudal stiffening girder. A new cross bar sitting under the frame is made from flattened .7mm brass rod.
And painted;
I used Humbrol 5027 acrylic grey apart from the inside of the body which was a mix of Humbrol Leather and Citadel 'Rhinox Hide'.
The longitudal stiffener is fitted to skips designed for loco haulage. Skips built for hand or animal haulage lacked this feature, and thats the type of wagon that I've modelled next. So on the wagon below both the longitudal and cross stiffeners have been completely cut away, again a new cross brace has been added from flattened brass rod;
To attempt to give the wagon a more 'lightweight' look I've cut away the coupling hooks and replaced them with .45mm brass rod (something that I may do to all future wagons) and I'm not fitting coupling loops, it can sit at the rear or in the middle of a rake.
Eagle-eyed viewers might spot some white plasticard triangles sitting under the body support standards, when I was building this wagon I forgot that I wasn't intending on fitting coupling loops and modified the ends to suit by carving away material to clear the loop 'ears', then of course I had to replace the missing material with .020" plasticard... Making mistakes isn't so bad most of the time, it keeps us humble, and putting them right can make us better modellers.
This one is finished in Tamiya 'Nato Black' with the body interior finished as above;
On both wagons I've again fitted the almost invisible locking catches and bars, from flattened .45mm brass wire, and I've also blackened the axles with Birchwood Casey Super Blue.
Three in a row;
Measuring the Parkside kit and comparing it to a drawing published in the Moseley ''Rugga' book reveals that the chassis is 1 scale foot too long (4mm) and 11 scale inches too wide (approx 3.7mm). Obviously the frame needs to be overwidth to account for our overscale track gauge and wheelsets, and I'm sure that it was made overlong to keep the frame in proportion. Of course this means that the body is also overscale. OO9 really is a bastard compromise!
Paul.
Sunday, 14 December 2014
13 comments:
Feel free to leave comments but please note that due to spam issues they are subject to moderation and therefore unlikely to appear immediately. Don't let that put you off though.
Spam never gets published but does make me laugh! Anonymous comments don't get published either.
If you're an engineering company trying to use this blog for free advertising, ask yourself this. What have you got to offer me in return for having your website link published?
And whilst your reading this, everything I post is subject to copyright.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
They look great. I guess the next step is to cut out the 1foot and 11inch pieces and glue them back together for OO6 :P
ReplyDeleteThanks Mark.
DeleteFor 18" gauge I'd be tempted to try and persuade someone to design a printed skip, maybe even inside framed ;-)
Well the chassis should certainly be nice and easy; for an inside frame I'd use the same clip idea I did for the slab wagons. Printing the skips might be more of a challenge; you could re-use the parkside skip I suppose, although brass sheet might give some nice results. Any prototype photos? What wheel size and axle diameter would you use?
DeleteA printed chassis and etched body would be an ideal combination, only bettered by a nice cast frame. Actually this would work well for OO9, inside framed skips would add variety and mining tubs are sadly lacking.
DeleteI'll have to dig out some drawings!
There are three inside frame colliery tubs shown in the blue Hudson booklet on page 27. Not sure on the exact gauge of them but certainly the middle one would be fairly easy to model given the simple tub shape. Might have to have a crack at that one in OO9 even without a decent scale drawing.
DeleteI have drawings of Hudson 'U' mine tubs Mark, I'll send you copies if you want.
DeleteSounds perfect. I'm looking for more Hudson wagons to model/build for the Hudson test track diorama and I'd be happy to do OO6 versions as well as OO9 (once I have the 3D model tweaking it should be "fairly" easy).
DeleteHi Paul, that's a very attractive train of skips. (is train the right word for that? well it's better than "a school of skips" I suppose!).
ReplyDeleteYour mention of animal haulage made me think it would be nice to have a horse-drawn train of skips as a scenic feature on an OO layout. I'm taking notes :-)
Thanks Mikkel.
DeleteI'd say 'rake' of skips is probably about right.
Horse haulage was fairly common until quite recently (if not still used) here in the UK at several small private coal mines. I quite fancy making up a plateway diorama with a horse in front of a train of wooden waggons.
Thanks Paul, I thought a rake only applied to coaches, so that's good to know.
ReplyDeleteI had no idea horse haulage was so recent!
I like your comment about mistakes. I keep telling myself that what separates the good modelmakers from everybody else is that they are prepared to keep doing the thing again and again until it's right. And then, every Preston Wakes, something goes right the first time and I stand back, amazed at it :-)
ReplyDeleteI love the tubs/skips (and the very fine job you have made of them) and the thought of a little drift mine with a rake of two or three being hauled by a horse is a beguiling prospect. Mikkel has a nice post about horses on his blog...
Thanks Iain.
DeleteMistakes happen. Its frustrating for sure, but if we're smart we learn from them and move forward.
Have you seen Adrian Booth's series of books on small mines, published by the Industrial Railway Society? I'm not sure if they're in print at the moment but I think that they'd be right up your street. There's 4 books, British Small Mines (North), British Small Mines (South), and Small Mines of South Wales in two volumes. Although a few systems used locos most of the mines were worked by hand horse or cable.
Every post on Mikkel's blog is nice!
Thanks very much, Paul, I didn't know about those books! I tend to concentrate on very"old" mines from a mining viewpoint, not a railway one- so these IRS books will be highly interesting. Gigantic internet search about to start...:-)
DeleteAgree with you wholeheartedly about Mikkel's blog.